Off Base
Scioscia to Manage Dodgers

Ocober 9, 2007

No, really. It could happen.

All the Dodgers need is a thimble full of initiative, and perhaps a little you-know-what (rhymes with stalls, and involves some of the same equipment).

L.A. has at best a kinda-maybe-sorta-qualified skipper in Grady Little. Each of the team's six World Championships have been accomplished with a Hall of Fame manager at the helm. There's a correlation, pal, and it's not rocket science.

Mike Scioscia is one of nine managers on the planet (of working age) with a championship ring, which even if that were the only good thing you could say about the man, would qualify him for the Dodgers job. The fact that the club has Little under contract at the moment is completely irrelevant.

The fact that the Angels have Scioscia under contract, while not irrelevant, isn't all that big a deal either. You start by quietly and politely asking Anaheim for permission. Or you tamper, with Tommy Lasorda as the go between, and pay the fine which might ensue. Either works for me.

The Angels are the local team currently under the microscope for their shortcomings, or at least more currently, and are therefore more susceptible to public relations headaches. If the Dodgers were prepared to offer their old hand a silver-platter deal with all the trimmings, and Scioscia had even the slightest bit of interest, Arte Moreno would look like a grinch to tell L.A. to stuff it. And he already looks like a grinch, OK; now more than ever.

Compensation isn't unprecedented, so there's always that if need be. There must be another Aybar or Izturis in the Dodgers system someplace.

Now, Scioscia is the fourth highest paid manager in baseball, at $2 million a year. Grady Little is tied with Ron Washington of Texas and Joe Maddon of Tampa Bay for fifth lowest paid, at $600,000. Sure, I hear you; if the shoe fits. But if the Dodgers are going to compete payroll-wise with every major league team except Boston and the Yankees, is it too much to ask that they hire a genuinely-qualified manager to mind the store?

I mean, when you're spending $108 million on player personnel, and the whole damn company is worth five to ten times that amount, wouldn't spending another $2 million a year to protect your investment to the best of your ability be wise, if not actually required? If the Dodgers can justify $44 million for five years of Juan Pierre, is $14 million for five years of Mike Scioscia really beyond the realm? That's not a rhetorical question, by the way. The answer is yes. Obviously.

Bringing Scioscia back where he belongs, and where he's always belonged is so totally doable. There's zero downside to making a discrete effort, and very little downside if the story leaks. In fact, the Dodgers can claim hero status in Los Angeles pretty much however it works out.

They really, really, really ought to go for it. Let Pittsburgh hire some other former Dodger, or Torey Lovullo, for that matter. See if I care. See if anyone cares. That makes complete sense anyway. It's time for old number 14, Iron Mike, to come back to L.A. once and for all. It doesn't take all that much imagination. C'mon…

Talkback: Your comments are always encouraged…

I can't lie to you. I'll take my solace where I can get it, and watching the Angels getting swept was fun. The Pads el-foldo was cool too, but Anaheim's losing tops San Diego's. Sorry if you feel slighted; I'm just being honest. The Angels getting beaten silly? Well, that's just gravy, and it's almost like, what's the point of the whole season if it's three-and-out all the time? And man, is that Orange County stadium-full-of-red ugly or what? That is a rhetorical question, by the way…

Nothing against the Cubs and their poor fans, but it's appropriate that the National League Central gets a little comeuppance. The Central is a lame division, and like last year, was barely worthy of even being represented in the postseason. The Diamondbacks are the vastly superior club this season, and the Cardinals were an unfortunate fluke last year…

Jackass of the Week: George Steinbrenner. He's a repeat winner, so no trophy for the boss this time. And besides, Bruce Springsteen is the real boss, not Steinbrenner…

If Alex Rodriquez is considering giving therapy a try anytime soon, here's hoping he gives John Smoltz' shrink the gig, rather than Mark Hendrickson's…

Trivia: The Dodgers franchise, including both the Brooklyn and Los Angeles versions, is in the midst of its second longest pennant-less stretch in history, at 19 seasons. What's the longest?

Eat! You're Skin and Bones! My friend, Eva Chase, is a finalist in the Manischewitz Cook Off Contest, and would appreciate your support. Please click the image below, and look for the San Francisco Region section. Scroll down to "E Chase, Recipe: Cilantro Marinated Salmon," and cast your vote for that cool plate of fish. It's way better than gefilte…

 

 

Mark it Down: Just 119 days until pitchers and catchers and Chad Moeller report...

Trivia Answer: The Dodgers won pennants in 1920 and 1941, with 20 years of despair in between…

Statue for Sandy: The Koufax in bronze campaign continues. Please Vote “Yes on 32.” And tell a friend…

Remember, glove conquers all….

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

....................

....................
About Us | Archives | Contact | Gift Shop | Home | Talkback | Where Are They Now | Write For Us....................
...............logo
Copyright © 2005 by BaseballSavvy.com